Consulting — ABOS Architecture

Your AI agents work in demos.
They fail in production.

I build the infrastructure that makes autonomous systems reliable: evaluation pipelines that catch silent failures, context architecture that gives agents the right information at the right time, and orchestration that coordinates multiple agents without cascading errors.

Not theory. I run an autonomous business operating system of 55+ interconnected projects — marketing, intelligence, publishing, identity — built solo with AI in 27 months, starting from zero coding knowledge. Every claim on this page links to something you can inspect.

55+
Interconnected projects
14
Deployed apps
89
Repos active, last 30 days
0
Enterprise clients — you’d be early, priced accordingly

Inspect the proof first

Don't take the pitch — take the evidence. All of it is public.

Live GitHub Metrics

Commit activity synced daily from GitHub by cron. 89 active repositories in the last 30 days. Not a screenshot — a live feed.

Case Studies

The AI Orchestra Method, the Teneo build, the custody-battle AI system — documented with the failures left in.

The Projects

55+ interconnected projects, 14 deployed apps, one shared auth layer, AI-to-AI service protocols between systems.

Independent Codebase Audit

March 2026: a Claude instance audited the Teneo production repo — 155+ Lambda functions, 7 domain stacks. Verdict: "needs hardening, not rebuilding."

What an ABOS Architect does

Most AI consulting teaches prompts. The actual bottleneck is coordination: integrating agents into real workflows, deciding what to automate, handling the moment an agent fails mid-task, and keeping humans in control of what ships.

I've solved that coordination problem across my own ecosystem — hierarchical multi-agent orchestration with approval gates, eval-driven development with LLM-as-judge and calibration sets, context architecture that routes agents to the right knowledge across 55 codebases, circuit breakers and dead-letter queues for when things break anyway. The first question I'll ask you is the one that matters: can you show me how you measure whether any of this actually works?

Engagements

ABOS Audit

$25K–$40K · 4–6 weeks

I evaluate your AI agents the way I evaluate mine: find the silent failure modes, map trust boundaries, identify the context gaps that make agents guess instead of know.

  • ·Evaluation pipeline review — how do you know any of this works?
  • ·Failure-mode map: where agents fail and what happens next
  • ·Context architecture gaps and a concrete fix plan

Agent Infrastructure Sprint

$50K–$100K · 8–12 weeks

Build the infrastructure that makes agents reliable: specification systems, multi-agent decomposition, context architecture, and an eval pipeline that catches regressions before users do.

  • ·Specification system your agents can actually follow
  • ·Multi-agent decomposition with approval gates and kill switches
  • ·Eval pipeline: LLM-as-judge, calibration sets, drift detection

Strategic Advisory

Limited availability · Ongoing

For founders who want to personally operate at AI-orchestra level — direction-setting, architecture reviews, and the working methods behind 18–24 concurrent Claude instances.

  • ·Async-first: documents and working sessions, not status meetings
  • ·Architecture reviews on real code, not slideware
  • ·AI Orchestra Method training for you or your team

Good fit / bad fit

Worth a call if

  • · You've raised and your agent pilots aren't becoming production systems
  • · You need eval infrastructure, not another demo
  • · You want your team faster with AI, without losing control of quality
  • · You can handle direct communication and ship-first iteration

Not a fit if

  • · You want someone to build your whole product for you
  • · You value credentials over inspectable work
  • · You're building surveillance or exploitation systems
  • · You want a generic "AI strategy" deck

Request a discovery call

Tell me what you're building and where it breaks. You'll get a direct reply within 24 hours — from me, not a funnel.

Response within 24 hours. No newsletter, no drip campaign — a direct reply.

Prefer email? travis@traviseric.com